10/8/04: Free and Worth Every Cent
I guess it started when the New York Post dropped their price
to 25 cents an issue a couple of years ago. Or maybe it was in the
mid-late 90's when the Voice went from $1.25 to FREE. Hell, it's probably
been going on since the advent of newspapers, and you see it in TV and magazines
and any other ad-driven medium as well. The goal, of course, is to maximize your
revenue. How best to do it is a tough question facing any publisher, and
there's a simple formula that helps them decide. Basically, if we lower
the price or give our product away for free, we will increase circulation.
Can we increase it enough so that the loss of revenue from the lowered purchase
price is more than offset by the increase we can charge our advertisers, as they
are now reaching more eyeballs? It's a gamble, I guess.
For those of you living outside New York City, the reason I
bring it up is
the arrival over the last few months of two free daily newspapers,
AM New
York & Metro. During morning rush hour, you will be offered one or both
of these new dailies at just about every subway station in Manhattan (and
possibly the other boroughs as well). New Yorkers are pretty tired of having
things handed to them on the street, so for these new entries to have a chance
to succeed, they have to be handing you something worth grabbing. As Mitch Hedberg put it, "When someone hands you a flier, it's like they're saying,
'Here, you throw this away.'" And judging from the quality of the two
papers, they clearly have to accomplish this
goal of grabworthiness on a very tight budget.
In my opinion, they are right on the border of success. Like,
they're good enough to take one if you have a ride over ten minutes long and you
know the train won't be crowded. You take one of the two papers, read
everything you need to read over the next ten to twenty minutes, and then you
toss it into the garbage on the platform when you arrive at your stop.
Pretty wasteful, but it's pretty convenient as well. I imagine if I was a
work pooper, it would be worth grabbing both AM NY and Metro, one for the ride
and one for your potty break. But I am not a work pooper, and if I was, I
doubt I would be so brazen as to head down the hall with one of these papers
tucked under my arm.
So the papers are readable enough that you will take one for
free on most days. Barely. But they are pretty bad. Make that very
bad. There is a significant dropoff in quality between the regular NYC
tabloids and the freebies. The freebies are just bad enough that you might
consider buying a Post for a quarter instead. The freebies are very, very
amateurish. But like the internet, these papers
appear to be an outlet for those whose viewpoints are either too controversial
or too stupid to find their way into the mainstream. It's kind of fun,
like a college newspaper. Sometimes, a brilliant voice that would never be heard
in a real newspaper sings through beautifully. But more often, it's just some douchebag running his mouth, like a blog on dirty recycled paper.
Today I read an opinion column in Metro that cracked
me up for a number of reasons. It wasn't particularly well written, and
the guy almost completely failed to make his point. It was some bullshit
about extreme sports and born-again Christianity. But he did say a couple of
things that you don't expect to see in a free daily paper grabbed by every kid in the
city on their way to school. My favorite being:
"Take it from me: Born-again Christianity and adolescence
is a dangerous combination simply because of the whole "abstinence thing." Your
teen years (13-18, preferably) are the best time to engage in indiscriminate sex
with uncaring acquaintances. Skydiving and base jumping are nothing compared to
the self-satisfaction one feels when sexually active at an early age."
Not exactly the New York Times. I don't know why I found that so amusing, maybe because
teenagers have never really needed encouragement from a fool in a free newspaper
to get their freak on. I also like that he says, "Take it from me," as if
he knows what the fuck he's talking about. We should take it from you
because you are an expert in what again...? When you hear somebody start a
sentence with "Take it from me" you can be fairly certain some unsupported
horseshit is about to flow from their lips. "Take it from me" gets the shoe.
It's also funny how he says "your teen years" and then feels the need to clarify
his point as "13-18, preferably." As if the pleasures of indiscriminate sex
suddenly go sharply downhill the moment you turn 19.
Here's the column.
***
I know most of you are too cool to be impressed by celebrity
sightings. If you weren't, you wouldn't be reading such a hip, happening
site as this. But I'm a dork, so I'm going to go ahead and tell you that
if you want to see some famous people, you should head to Cafe Luxembourg on
West 70th street. It's good (although overpriced) food, and here is a list
of celebrities we've spotted there:
-Nathan Lane, Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker (last night, together
with two other actor types I didn't recognize)
-Robin WIlliams (last time we were there)
-Liam Neeson (like 4 times)
-Peter Riegert
-Lenny Kravitz and Nicole Kidman (together)
-Michael Strahan
Not bad. Sarah Jessica Parker looked very good, much
less leathery and makeup-encrusted than you're used to seeing her on TV.
***
This is one of those little crossroads moments at the
verbungle.com offices. Nobody here is really happy with the product as it now
stands. We're like the Metro of bullshit websites. We're
considering a number of major changes, including:
-Using a program like Blogger, Typepad, LiveJournal or Movable Type for the
blog entries. I need something that's going to organize my shit for me.
Any recommendations are welcome.
-At the very least, organizing the entries so you can click or link on an
individual entry. I'm trying this starting today.
-Changing the format/content in some substantial and interesting way. Again,
your feedback is welcome.
-Publish less often; maybe something halfway decent every week or so, instead of
something lame every damn night. Although posting nightly is highly addictive.
-Ending the site completely and immediately, recharging for a few months and
coming back (or not) with something newer and cooler.
-Ending the site in March of 2005, which will mark two years on the job (my
domain registration also expires then, so it might be a convenient time to hang
it up).
Of course, these feelings usually pass, so the eight of you can
likely expect to see more of the same crap in the upcoming weeks and months.
But if you have any ideas at all on how to make things more better, please let
me know.
***
The new empeetrey comes from Beck. It's from back when
he was still fun, as evidenced by one of my all-time favorite lines:
"smokin' broken pencils and beatin' up kids"
It's called "Fume," and I hope you
enjoy it.