3/22/05: Just the
Facts
You know what trait I value in a friend maybe above all
others? More than honesty, loyalty, integrity, humor, thoughtfulness, all that
crap? Accuracy. When I am engaged in a dialogue with a friend, it is very
important to me that the information this friend is sending my way is accurate.
There's nothing I hate more than talking to somebody who's full of shit.
Now when I say full of shit, I'm not talking about people who are outright
liars, like Big Jim Lang can be on occasion. On the contrary, one of the best
things about Big Jim Lang is that he's full of fascinating information, and for
the most part he has vetted it for truth. Sure, he'll slip in an
outrageous lie every now and then, sometimes for no reason at all, but that's
part of his charm.
I think I've done a good job of
surrounding myself with people like Jim: interesting folks with something to say
that isn't bullshit. What I can't stand are people who are either too stupid or
too lazy to report information accurately in conversation. There is a guy I work
with who has an outstanding rumor or story every time I see him. He speaks
with authority and conviction, and he is absolutely full of shit 88.7% of the
time. It's hard to even have a conversation with him. What makes it even
more irritating is his condescending tone, as if he is doing you a tremendous
favor by enlightening you. And then what he says is not just wrong, but
often so wrong that you know it's wrong as he says it.
It's amazing the stuff he comes up with.
If it's work-related, it'll go: "Yeah, (Vice President) Ricky
is totally fighting for his job. They're just waiting 'til the new year to
fire him. He's done." Within weeks of this pronouncement, Ricky will
be promoted to SVP.
Religion: "If the Pope steps down, the Mayor of Rome is
acting pope until a new pope is named."
Geology: "The only reason the tsunami didn't destroy New York
is because the ice caps protected us."
He's equally deadly on sports, politics, world affairs,
and just about anything else. He'll chime in on any
conversation, too. He absolutely HAS to have the final say on every matter.
Just shut up.
I shouldn't complain so much, because I'm probably not the
best reporter of facts myself. For instance, I have read probably 500
pages of information on the Kennedy assassination in various places, but I skim
over a lot of details and I end up remembering just enough to pass on some
half-truths as fact. But usually I will at least acknowledge that I don't know
what the hell I'm talking about. I won't report it all as top-quality
information.
And sometimes I actually have real data to pass along.
Like when I say the following: the HD Magic Box is
misbehaving like a Mofo. Shutting down, pixelatin', freezing up. Any
suggestions?
EJ nailed yesterday's but I bet nobody can tell me
wheredat?